TO THE PRO LIFE PRESS: DO NOT CLAIM TO BE LEADING THE CHARGE TO END LEGALIZED CHILD KILLING IF YOU IGNORE THE BEST TACTIC USED IN 39 YEARS.

George Offerman

My apologies for the lengthy title of this piece, but I couldn’t come up with a better headline that gets to the essence of this piece.  That being said, the deliberate ‘icing’ by the pro-life ‘press’ of Randall Terry’s presidential campaign (and the congressional campaigns of Angela Michael in Illinois and David Lewis who is running against Speaker Boehner in Ohio) of UNEDITED AND GRAPHIC COMMERCIALS soon to be running in many of the major cities across this land during the super bowl pregame and game is unprecedented as in EVER.  There has never been a presidential candidate before, when using federal campaign laws to run unedited and graphic pictures of dead babies has received the attention these ads are already getting in the states and cities they are being run in.  Nothing has come close to generating the debate on legalized child killing as these ads, which depict in the most graphic way imaginable the despicable nature of “choice’.  There are no efforts put forth BY ANY PRO LIFE GROUP that is even remotely close to doing what these ads are doing.

These groups have used any number of ‘reasons’ why they have not been supportive of Mr. Terry’s, Mrs. Michael's and Mr. Lewis's efforts as their excuse in not backing and funding this effort.  There are other groups and pro life ‘press’ that have simply chosen to ignore these efforts and has rebuffed any attempts by the Terry team reaching out to them.  Many of these groups don’t want to think and act outside of the box given to them by the IRS and the 501 c 3 laws, and do not want to jeopardize their standing among those who they wish to impress, but do not hold to the pro life positions these groups and leaders claim to be representing.

One of the primary refutations offered by many of these organization is that Randall Terry is an ‘attention hog’ is ‘showboating’ and making the claim that it is “about Randall Terry all of the time”.  Some have gone on further to make claims that Randall Terry is so ‘80’s’ and is irrelevant and ought to move on with his life.  I am not sure if these folks making these statements flunked a basic logic course, or truly don’t have the mental capacity to put two coherent thoughts together, but a simple Google search of Randall Terry will reveal at least 200 stories done on these commercials in the past several weeks, with a good number of them being national and international in nature.  I don’t know about these folks, but this much press in such a short time frame seems to make Mr. Terry and his efforts VERY RELEVANT and has brought the issue of legalized child killing front and center of this debate.

I can (and did) a Google search on any number of ‘pro life organizations’ and ‘pro life press’ and find only their own references concerning their efforts.  The MSM is not covering anything they are doing to any extent even remotely close like these graphic commercials are getting.  They are not garnering the attention, and cannot make any serious claims that their efforts are anywhere near the ‘moral’ or ‘noble’ or ‘effective’ standards they have arbitrarily set for their mediocre efforts and lame attempts to mitigate their responsibility in selling the babies out.  No one fears these groups and organizations, and not one government agency or state government or local government or television networks or their affiliates are trying to block any of their efforts to get the message out the way they are the Terry campaign and commercials.  To put it simply, the pro deathers and their conspiratorial and complacent lackey MSM are scared “sh-tless” of this message getting out.

For those who believe Randall Terry and his message are irrelevant or ‘showboating’, explain how the MSM would ‘kowtow’ to Randall Terry and his message.  Does Randall Terry carry God like powers and authority in which he can through the process of osmosis “will’ the MSM into showing these commercials and giving press to his candidacy?  How is this ‘irrelevant’ man making this issue so ‘relevant’ and making it the scourge of this year’s campaign?  I would like for the lame stream pro life press and pro life groups to answer these questions (if they dare).  I also want to know from these leaders and organizations why they are not getting the press and coverage if their efforts are as ‘noble, moral, good and effective”.  Are you deliberately keeping your efforts outside of the MSM presence and hiding them under a bushel basket?  Are your efforts ‘stealth’ in order to not garner negative press from the MSM whom you so loathe?  Maybe double secret probation is in effect here?

For the leaders in the pro life press:  are you aware that Randall Terry and David Lewis and Angela Michael - these three individuals - have garnered more press coverage in the Main Stream Media than all other pro-life groups in the entire nation combined in the last 3 months. The very words "child killing" and "murder of babies" have been in more stories covering them than every other pro-life group in the nation combined in the last year. In other words, their efforts are driving the debate forward, in the exact arenas where it counts the most: politics and the press.  Furthermore, when Randall's ads run in as many as 20 cities (including Chicago, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Tulsa...etc.. and Angela's and David's ads run in St. Louis, Decatur, Terra Haute, Cincinnati, and Dayton, they will reach collectively into over 20 million homes with images of dead babies.

For years, pro-lifers and the pro life press have complained and whined that they do not get fair coverage, or even ANY coverage from the press. These candidates have shown that one can get good coverage, and fair coverage, if one does something that is NEWSWORTHY.  It is so ironic that those so called leaders in the pro life press and movement can hold this standard to the MSM, yet they themselves sit in judgement of 'news' they deem is not appropriate or 'right' and 'choose' to ignore, or to condemn or to simply negate it by claiming all efforts are as 'noble, moral and effective' as all the others.  Yet no one is paying attention or covering their issues as they see it.  So, the leadership of the pro life press is reaping what they sew, and they don't seem to be dealing with it very well. 

For the leaders in the pro life press:  do you find it necessary to write pabulum for the pro life movement in order to raise funds?  Do you enjoy continuing your ‘count’ of the number of issues you put out on the web?  Do you look forward to a ‘long and fruitful life’ of ‘working to end abortion’ while ‘icing’ the real efforts in order to propagate your own ability to make a living off this movement?  It’s time to stand up for the babies and grow a set.  It’s time to end this holocaust, and show all of these ’choicers’ what their choice actually looks like.  If you are constitutionally incapable of making these moves, get the hell out of the way, and you will see how real men get the job done.

You in the pro life press: it's time to report the real truth to the warriors out there, and it is time to be bold, told and sold on the pro life message and do your job as if the world depends on it.  This is a time to get the job done.  We need warriors on the battlefield, and not the collection of wimps, weenies, fruits, flakes and nuts who currently occupy the ‘front lines’ of this movement.  When enough real men step up and do real battle, we will see real result and a real ending of legalized child killing as the Living God requires.  Until then, we will see nothing that resembles any movement towards victory.

To contribute to the congressional runs of Angela Michael in Illinois and David Lewis, running against Speaker Boehner, please go to the following sites:

 http://www.angelamichaelforcongress.com/    

http://www.davidlewisforcongress.com/   

The Jewish Holocaust and the American Holocaust of Babies: Why They Are NOT the Same    For decades the pro-life movement has made the comparison between the slaughter of unborn babies and the holocaust of Jews in Nazi Germany.    During many TV or radio interviews I have given, I have discussed the similarity between Nazi Germany and America, only to have the hosts or the callers howl in rage that such a comparison is improper, even ethically wrong.    I have long pondered the differences of these two killing sprees, and have come to the conclusion that my critics are correct: these two holocausts are in fact quite different…in regards to the victims.    I will now delineate six distinct areas of difference that come to my mind, and leave it to the reader to determine my subsequent conclusions.    1) A Jew could flee. There are many stories of Jews fleeing Nazi Germany or the nations that were occupied by Nazi forces. By God’s kindness – and often with the kindness and risks of friends and strangers – Jews fled to safety.    In contrast, and unborn baby cannot flee. With a few stunning exceptions – such as late term babies who survive an attempted abortion, or a woman with twins has one baby killed, and the second one escapes detection – those offered up to the abortionist’s knife are hunted and slain.    2) A Jew could beg for his/her life. Again, stories are told, movies have been made, highlighting the Jews who begged for mercy from their assailants and captors, and received it.    Conversely, a baby cannot beg for mercy. They have no audible voice. When sought for death, they are dispatched…with at most a silent scream.    3) A Jew could hide. The Hiding Place by Corrie ten Boom and The Diary of Anne Frank relate the concealment of families and individuals from the Nazis. Some survived, others did not. But the opportunity to hide did exist for some.    A baby has no hiding place; no secret corner in the womb to conceal herself from her assassins. Who the blade seeks, it finds.    4) A Jew could cry for help. Certain Jews escaped death because their cries for help were heard at home and abroad.    In contrast, a baby cannot cry out to friends, strangers, or sympathetic advocates. The child is speechless before the executioner in the secret place of the womb. He lives and dies mute…unheard to all…but God.    5) A Jew could defend himself. To our amazement, the number of times that this happened seems to be few and far between. But surely it did happen, and assuredly it could have happened. The ability was present, even if the will was not.    Conversely, the in-utero child has no might equal to the suction machine that tears her limb from limb; no strength to fend off the scalpel and forceps that butcher him like a lamb at the slaughter.    6) Jews could band together for self-defense. The recent movie Defiance – based on the true story – depicted Jews who banded together, and used force (violence) to protect themselves from their would-be murderers. (Such self-defense was absolutely ethical; their God-given right.)    Unborn boys and girls enjoy no such opportunity for joint resistance. They are alone in the womb (unless there are twins or triplets, etc.) with no chance to form a “confederacy of fetuses” to physically oppose their slayers. Each lives alone, and perishes alone in a merciless death.    Beyond these six physical differences, the distinctive human motivations and feelings of both sets of killers deserve to be contrasted and compared.    Anti-Semitism is a plaque in the earth; a vile sin against God and the human race. However, the perversion and corruption of reason and conscience through the propaganda of anti-Semites coupled with the xenophobia that naturally haunts our souls can at least offer explanation how some weak-minded and corrupted fools might be led to believe that “the Jews are the problem.”    But who – except for a few Malthusian scoundrels – really believes that “babies are the problem”? The natural maternal and paternal bond is so strong; that longing of a female to hold and cherish her own baby, or a man to father his own son or daughter is one of the strongest urges known to mankind.    What type of evil…what type of perversion…what type of sinister and demonic forces are at work in the earth and in our souls that we would defy all that we are – and defy the very God-given urge to bear and embrace our offspring – to the point that we would kill our own children?    The above six differences – augmented by the chasm of disparity between the motivation to hate any people group vs. the deliberate murder of our own flesh and blood – lead me to conclude that these two holocausts are not only different, but that the slaughter of unborn babies is a far worse crime against God and man.    The shedding of innocent blood, “the blood of their sons and daughters,” is a vile, unspeakable crime. The blood of these babies cries to the heavens. Let us not be surprised when God smites this nation – and the earth – with a curse, in response to the cry of that innocent blood.    If you agree with this message, and want my TV ads to run across Iowa and New Hampshire and Boston, then please watch the ad below, and GIVE as generously as you can. You donation will be used to run pro-life ads on TV that SHOW THE VICTIMS OF ABORTION. GIVE TO THIS AD! 30 Second Pro-Life Ad (Click here to give to pro-life Ads)

THE SCORE CARD

George Offerman

As promised, the tally of what the pro-life organizations did concerning Missy Smiths candidacy and subsequent run, in showing graphic images, uncensored on the airwaves of Washington, D.C. This was an unprecedented opportunity, and something that has always been claimed by ‘our side’ as a strategy to get the word out. Well, here is the tally of those who stepped up to the plate and maximized this opportunity, versus those who are talk and ran from this. We will be producing this in spread sheet form within the next few days, but I wanted to publish this list because I understand that many of these organizations that did nothing, in the name of ‘not violating our 501c3 clause” are claiming victory and sending out fund raising letters stating such.

It is disingenuous at least, and fraudulent at its worst, that these organizations claim to have influenced the election, when nearly all of them claimed “We cannot name names, by either endorsing particular candidates, or naming those that should not be elected”. Then why in the world did they, or can they claim to ‘influence’ the outcomes of the election? Does this not seem hypocritical? They have no business making this claim if they cannot name names, and as such, they are obeying man’s laws over God’s. As Christians, we do have the right AND the obligation to correct wayward brothers and sisters, and do have the right to say this in public. We at Insurrecta Nex want the front line pro lifer, who wants to see this holocaust end, to see how these groups behaved during this unprecedented opportunity.

This is how to read the following information. These organizations and individuals were contacted, either by telephone, or email, or both and there was a minimum of two communications made to each. They were asked to do three things: 1) Personally endorse Missy Smith for congress, 2) personally donate to Missy’s campaign, and 3) either link Missy’s site or send out Missy’s site information to their distribution list. Along with this were instructions on how to comply with 501c3 laws, and not at any time was anyone asked to violate any laws in complying. This request was made straight to the organizations and individuals who have cried “foul’ in the past concerning the “censored’ nature of legalized child killing, and this campaign and ads told the unbridled truth in uncensored fashion about legalized child killing.

I will start by listing those who complied with all three, then two, then one, then finally, those who did nothing and/or chose to ignore this campaign. Unfortunately, it is this last group that is the largest, and frankly, they should be ashamed they call themselves pro lifers.

Those that met all three requests: Jill Stanek, blogger, Defend Life, Jack Ames, National Black Pro Life Union, and Dr. Alan Keyes. Thank you for your support and true dedication to the pro-life cause. You are truly in this battle to end legalized child killing and God Bless you.

Those who met two of the three requests: Operation Save American, Rev. Flip Benham, Pro Life Action League, Joe and Ann Scheidler, and Priests for Life, Fr. Frank Pavone. Again, thank you to this group, but there are lingering questions, such as, what stopped you from sending out the site information to your distribution lists?

Those who met one of three requests are broken down into two groups, the first are those who endorsed only, and the second are those who contributed. The endorsers only were: Human Life International, Rachael’s Vineyard, CPLS, Dr. Monica Miller, California Human Rights Amendment, Rev. Walter Hoye, Black Americans for Life, and Ken and Brenda Battle Jordan.
Contributors were: Nebraska RTL, and the Justice Foundation.

Likewise, those who did none of the above can be broken down into two groups. The first group consists of those who did minimal work, such as posting an article, or had someone in their organization do something personally for the campaign. Those who did not complete any of the requests, but did at least mention Missy Smiths campaign were: The Vortex, Michael Voris, Spirit Daily, Michael Brown, Life site News, John Henry, Life News, Steven Ertelt and Pro Life Unity all ran at least one story covering the campaign, and Jonathan Darnel, National coordinator for Pro Life Unity Personally donated a substantial amount towards the ads.

Now, for those who did nothing, and either responded with excuses concerning their ‘inability’ to do anything, due to the 501c3 status, or did not even bother to respond: National Right To Life, March For Life, Nellie Gray, Silent No More, Heritage Foundation, Catholic Online, American Life League, Judi Brown, Live Action, Lila Rose, Bell Rescue, Expectant Mother Care, Stand True, Operation Rescue (west) Wichita, Troy Newman, Jeff White, 40 Days for Life, Americans United for Life, Susan B. Anthony List, and Operation Outcry.

So, here you have it. Now, when the fundraising letters arrive by the dozens, and these groups want to ‘boast’ about their ‘accomplishments’ you can use this as a guide to decide whether these groups actually represent your interests in this war to end legalized child killing. This information is accurate, and all of theses organizations and individuals were given ample time and opportunity to respond. This is the scorecard.

THE ADS ARE DOING THEIR JOB

George Offerman

Missy Smith’s campaign ads ran on the local affiliates of the major networks starting Tuesday, and they have caused a great deal of discomfort among the liberals and child killing population in the nation’s capital. For the first time EVER the truth of legalized child killing is front and center, and all of these ‘pro choicers’ are now getting a naked view of the truth of the matter. And as predicted, they are going after Missy Smith and her ‘tactlessness’ instead of doing a gut check and admitting they are co conspirators in grisly murder that occurs daily and is scheduled.

We normally watch the 5pm WUSA channel 9 news, and it was very interesting how the newscasters had to take time to explain these ads, and how they ‘had no control over content, due to federal law”. They also had to utilize other advertising time to ‘warn viewers of the graphic nature’. Yes, the same network that airs CSI, NCIS and a myriad of other programs that leave no murder and torture scene to the imagination. Anyway, those in the nation’s capital are squirming, and falling all over themselves to ‘stop’ this atrocity. I believe it was Joe Sheidler that stated “Find out what annoys the enemy, and do only that”. These people are truly rattled, and are foaming at the mouth and its fun to watch these people who want to ‘kill’ for the right to choose, yet cannot stand the thought of looking at their handiwork. For once, the forces of evil are on defense, and they don’t know how to handle it.

Several of us have been spending countless hours over the past several days sending out emails and telephoning leaders in many of the pro life organizations. What may or may not be amazing to the stalwarts and front line people in the pro life arena are the excuses and reasons most are NOT getting behind this push to have the commercials shown. Yes, there is a lot of talk amongst many groups that the message needs to get out, but now that it is, many are beginning to show their true colors, with yellow being the dominant one. When all is said and done, we will be putting out a ‘score card’ on the performance of these organizations, and letting their donors know who and what is happening, and seeing firsthand why this war is being lost.

I am again putting out to the pro life organizations to endorse Missy Smith, and to open up and pass along Missy’s site to your distribution lists. The people on your lists are adults, and have the right to make up their own minds concerning this matter, and will not donate if they don’t want to get involved. But that decision needs to be theirs. This is a very straight forward request and not difficult to do. It will require most to step outside of their comfort zones, but it is a small price to pay to finally have this issue in the open at the right time and the right place.

So, as the clock ticks, the sheep and goats are separating themselves in this movement. We will see who the real players are soon enough as this ‘once in 38 year’ opportunity winds down, and those who state they are shackled by laws and other matters, then fund raise for future races and will want to fight for efforts that garner little attention and change few hearts. We will then know who is really on board, and ultimately, know who to fund and who to work with from now on.